Matt Cabral
Matt Cabral at Tasca Automotive Group
Refer Me

Matt Cabral

General Manager

Tasca Automotive Group

1300 Pontiac Ave
Cranston, RI 02920

Contact Me
4.4
19 Reviews
4.4

19 Reviews

Write a Review

19 Reviews of Matt Cabral

January 26, 2024

Dealership Rating
Employee Rating

Best dealership in RI. Quality salesman Don Mailloux has never disappointed me. I have purchased/leased 9 cars from him. He treats me like family. More

by JoeM
Sales Price Transparency
Trade-in Experience
Purchase Time
Finance Experience
Recommend Dealer
Yes
Jan 28, 2024

Tasca Automotive Group responded

Thank you so much for your wonderful review! We are thrilled to hear that Don always provides you with great service. We thank you for choosing Tasca Automotive Group, Joe. We truly appreciate your loyalty to us.

January 09, 2024

Dealership Rating
Employee Rating

I have never had such a no stress purchase experience, all I can say is awesome, I recommend this team to anyone in need of a car or truck!!! “AWESOME “ thank you More

by stephen.brown0239
Sales Price Transparency
Purchase Time
Finance Experience
Recommend Dealer
Yes

Other Employees Tagged: Bayo Dina, Cannon Brian

Jan 09, 2024

Tasca Automotive Group responded

It's great to hear that we were able to help you out. Our goal is to make sure everyone who walks through the door leaves happy. Thank you, Stephen, for choosing Tasca Automotive Group!

February 07, 2023

Dealership Rating
Employee Rating

Matt Cabral and team were phenomenal. I worked directly with Danny, who was professional, knowledgeable, friendly, and helpful. Not once did I feel pressured, and I was confident he negot More

by k_jones
Sales Price Transparency
Trade-in Experience
Purchase Time
Finance Experience
Recommend Dealer
Yes

Other Employees Tagged: Michael Yang , Danny Jordan

Feb 08, 2023

Tasca Automotive Group responded

We love hearing about guests who have a wonderful experience at our dealership and we are happy you are one of them! We understand that buying a car is an important decision and we are honored that you chose Tasca Volvo Cranston. Please feel free to contact us if you have any questions on your new purchase. The Tasca Volco Cranston team

January 20, 2023

Dealership Rating
Employee Rating

I had a a great experience with Tasca. Lou Colon was exceptional to deal with and made me feel right at home. More

by mjrose234
Sales Price Transparency
Trade-in Experience
Purchase Time
Finance Experience
Recommend Dealer
Yes

Other Employees Tagged: Lou Colon, Michael Yang

Jan 21, 2023

Tasca Automotive Group responded

Thank you for choosing Tasca Automotive Group. Your feedback and rating mean a lot to us. We're glad Lou and the team were able to help, and we hope to see you again!

November 29, 2022

Dealership Rating
Employee Rating

On 10-07-2021 I purchased a 2016 Jeep Renagade from Tasca ford in Cranston. For the amount of $19,409. I made a down payment of $ 5000 cash. On 10-08-2021 The Jeep broke down, check engine light came on and More

by cruzadames
Service Price Transparency
Workmanship
Service Time
Service Communication
Recommend Dealer
No

Other Employees Tagged: Stephen D'Elena, Jaime tasca

Dec 01, 2022

Tasca Automotive Group responded

Thank you for your review. We're sorry your visit didn't go as planned, and we'd like to address these issues with our team. If it's possible to discuss your visit in more detail, please send us a message with your contact information so that we can reach out. We strive to make sure that all of our customers leave happy, and it's disappointing to learn that we missed the mark here.

Dec 01, 2022

cruzadames responded

This most be a generic response Cause I been talking with Tasca going around in circles with no success. They do have my information. This message it just protocol Not serious, not sincere. All Tasca really care about it your $$$$$ Sadly true.

Dec 02, 2022

cruzadames responded

Repair Interval and Coverage Period Tasca kept the Jeep from 6/22/22 till 8-4-22 And Still didn’t fixed. Be advise 4 repair attempts or 30 calendar days out of service 1 year or 15,000 miles. Rhode Island consumers with lemon vehicles may be protected under either the Rhode Island Lemon Law, the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act (the federal lemon law), or both. Remedies may include refund, replacement or cash compensation such as diminished value and/or incidental and consequential damages. Attorneys’ fees also available meaning qualified consumers may receive Rhode Island lemon law attorney representation at no cost. And even if a vehicle doesn’t qualify under either of these lemon laws, the Truth In Lending Act and/or other related car buying laws may provide an avenue to recover cash damages that can help you trade out or pay for repairs. Connect here for a free, no obligation Rhode Island Lemon Law case review. In most instances to qualify under a lemon law your vehicle must only have an unreasonable repair history under the warranty, including (but not limited to) 3-4 repair attempts for the same problem, 6 repairs total on the vehicle, or 30 days out of service by reason of repair. Rhode Island Lemon Law (Gen.Laws 1956, 31-5.2-1 to Gen.Laws 1956, 31-5.2-14) Gen.Laws 1956, 31-5.2-1. Definitions Gen.Laws 1956, 31-5.2-2. Manufacturers’ obligation to fulfill warranties Gen.Laws 1956, 31-5.2-3. Replacement of nonconforming vehicle Gen.Laws 1956, 31-5.2-4. Affirmative defenses Gen.Laws 1956, 31-5.2-5. Time allowed for correction of nonconformity Gen.Laws 1956, 31-5.2-6. Rights and remedies cumulative Gen.Laws 1956, 31-5.2-7. Informal dispute settlement procedures Gen.Laws 1956, 31-5.2-7.1. Procedure Gen.Laws 1956, 31-5.2-8. Waiver of rights prohibited Gen.Laws 1956, 31-5.2-9. Disclosure of nonconformity prior to resale Gen.Laws 1956, 31-5.2-10. Cause of action Gen.Laws 1956, 31-5.2-11. Attorney’s fees Gen.Laws 1956, 31-5.2-12. Commencement of action Gen.Laws 1956, 31-5.2-13. Deceptive trade practice Gen.Laws 1956, 31-5.2-14. Consumers’ council automobile dispute settlement panel–Motor vehicle arbitration board Rhode Island Lemon Law Statutes. Gen.Laws 1956, 31-5.2-1. Definitions The following words and phrases, for the purposes of this chapter, have the following meanings: “Consumer” means a buyer, other than for purposes of resale, of a motor vehicle, any person to whom that motor vehicle is transferred for the same purposes during the duration of any express or implied warranty applicable to that motor vehicle, and any other person entitled by the terms of that warranty to enforce its obligations. “Dealer” means any person engaged in the business of selling, offering to sell, soliciting, or advertising the sale of new motor vehicles. “Lease price” means the aggregate of: Lessor’s actual purchase costs. Collateral charges, if applicable. Any fee paid to another to obtain the lease. Any insurance or other costs expended by the lessor for the benefit of the lessee An amount equal to state and local sales taxes not otherwise included as collateral charges, paid by the lessor when the vehicle was initially purchased. An amount equal to five percent (5%) of the lessor’s actual purchase costs. “Lessee” means any consumer who leases a motor vehicle for one year or more pursuant to a written lease agreement which provides that the lessee is responsible for repairs to such motor vehicle or any consumer who leases a motor vehicle pursuant to a lease-purchase agreement. “Lessee cost” means the aggregate deposit and rental payments previously paid to the lessor for the leased vehicle. “Lessor” means a person who holds title to a motor vehicle leased to a lessee under a written lease agreement or who holds the lessor’s rights under such agreement. “Manufacturer” means any person, partnership, firm, association, corporation, or trust, resident or nonresident, which is engaged in the business of manufacturing or assembling new motor vehicles, or which is engaged in the business of importing new motor vehicles which are manufactured or assembled outside of the United States. “Motor vehicle” or “vehicle” means: (i) an automobile, truck, motorcycle, or van having a registered gross vehicle weight of less than ten thousand pounds (10,000 lbs.), sold, leased, or replaced by a dealer or manufacturer, except that it shall not include a motorized camper as defined in § 31-1-3; or (ii) a municipality, municipal agency or fire district owned or leased fire department motorized apparatus which has not been significantly altered in such a manner to cause a breach of the manufacturer’s warranty. “Nonconformity” means any specific or generic defect or malfunction, or any concurrent combination of such defects or malfunctions, that substantially impairs the use, market value, or safety of a motor vehicle. “Term of protection” means one year or fifteen thousand (15,000) miles of use from the date of original delivery of a new motor vehicle to the consumer, whichever comes first; or, in the case of a replacement vehicle provided by a manufacturer to a consumer under this chapter, one year or fifteen thousand (15,000) miles from the date of delivery to the consumer of that replacement vehicle, whichever comes first. “Motor vehicle arbitration board” means the board to be established by the department of attorney general as set forth in § 31-5.2-7.1, which board shall replace the consumers’ council automobile dispute settlement panel. Return to Top Rhode Island Lemon Law Rights. Gen.Laws 1956, 31-5.2-2. Manufacturers’ Obligation to Fulfill Warranties If a motor vehicle does not conform to any applicable express or implied warranties, including, but not limited to, the implied warranty of merchantability as defined in § 6A-2-314 and the implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose as defined in § 6A-2-315, and the consumer or lessee reports the nonconformity to the manufacturer of the vehicle, its agent, or its authorized dealer or lessor during the term of protection, the manufacturer, its agent, or its authorized dealer shall effect such repairs as are necessary to conform the vehicle to the warranty, notwithstanding the fact that those repairs are made after the expiration of the term. Return to Top Rhode Island new Car Lemon Law. Gen.Laws 1956, 31-5.2-3. Replacement of Nonconforming Vehicle If the manufacturer, its agent, or its authorized dealer or lessor does not conform the motor vehicle to any applicable express or implied warranty by curing any nonconformity after a reasonable number of attempts, the manufacturer shall accept return of the vehicle from the consumer or lessee and, at the consumer’s or lessee’s option, refund the full contract price or lease price of the vehicle including all credits and allowances for any trade-in vehicle, less a reasonable allowance for use, or replace it with a comparable new motor vehicle in good working order. A manufacturer replacing a motor vehicle shall have thirty (30) calendar days from the date of return of the motor vehicle under the provisions of this chapter to deliver a comparable motor vehicle. If, within that thirty (30) days, no comparable motor vehicle has been delivered, the manufacturer shall refund the full contract price or lease price less a reasonable allowance for use. In instances in which a vehicle is replaced by a manufacturer under the provisions of this chapter, the manufacturer shall reimburse the consumer or lessee for any fees for the transfer of registration or any sales tax incurred by the consumer or lessee as a result of that replacement. In instances in which a vehicle which was financed by the manufacturer or its subsidiary or agent is replaced under the provisions of this chapter, the manufacturer, subsidiary, or agent shall not require the consumer or lessee to enter into any refinancing agreement with an interest rate or other financial terms which are less favorable to the consumer or lessee than those stated in the original financing agreement. In instances in which a refund is tendered under the provisions of this chapter, the manufacturer shall also reimburse the consumer or lessee for incidental costs including sales tax, registration fee, finance charges, and any cost of nonremovable options added by an authorized dealer or lessor. Whenever a vehicle is replaced or refunded under the provisions of this chapter, in instances in which towing services and rental vehicles of comparable year and size were not made available at no cost to the consumer or lessee, the manufacturer shall also reimburse the consumer or lessee for towing and reasonable rental costs that were a direct result of vehicle nonconformity. Refunds shall be made to the consumer or lessee and to the lienholder, if any, as their interests may appear. A reasonable allowance for use shall be obtained by multiplying the total contract price or lessee cost of the vehicle by a fraction having as its denominator one hundred thousand (100,000) and having as its numerator the number of miles that the vehicle traveled prior to the consumer’s first report of the nonconformity to the manufacturer, its agent, or its dealer or lessor plus the number of miles that it traveled during any subsequent period when the vehicle was not out of service by reason of repair. A consumer or lessee shall have the option of retaining the use of any vehicle returned under the provisions of this chapter until such time as the consumer or lessee has been tendered a full refund or replacement vehicle acceptable to the consumer or lessee. The use of any vehicle retained by a consumer or lessee after its return to a manufacturer under the provisions of this chapter shall, in instances in which a refund is tendered, be reflected in the above-mentioned reasonable allowance for use. If applicable, refunds shall be made to the lessor and lessee as their interests may appear on the records of ownership as follows: the lessee shall receive the lessee cost and the lessor shall receive the lease price less the aggregate deposit and rental payments previously paid to the lessor for the leased vehicle. If it is determined that the lessee is entitled to a refund pursuant to this chapter, the consumer’s lease agreement with the lessor shall be terminated upon payment of the refund and no penalty for early termination shall be assessed. Return to Top Rhode Island Automobile Lemon Law. Gen.Laws 1956, 31-5.2-4. Affirmative Defenses It shall be an affirmative defense to any claim under this section: that an alleged nonconformity does not substantially impair the use, market value, or safety of the vehicle; or that a nonconformity is the result of abuse, neglect, or unauthorized substantial modification or alteration of the vehicle by the consumer or lessee. Return to Top Rhode Island Vehicle Lemon Law. Gen.Laws 1956, 31-5.2-5. Time Allowed for Correction of Nonconformity A reasonable number of attempts shall be presumed to have been undertaken to conform a motor vehicle to any applicable express or implied warranties if: The same nonconformity has been subject to repair four (4) or more times by the manufacturer or its agents or authorized dealers or lessors within the term of protection, but the nonconformity continues to exist or the nonconformity has recurred within the term of protection, or The vehicle is out of service by reason of the repair of any nonconformity for a cumulative total of thirty (30) or more calendar days during the term of protection; provided, however, that the manufacturer shall be afforded one additional opportunity, not to exceed seven (7) calendar days, to cure any nonconformity arising during the term of protection, notwithstanding the fact that the additional opportunity to cure commences after the term of protection. The additional opportunity to cure shall commence on the day the manufacturer first knows or should have known that the limits specified in subsection (a)(1) or (a)(2) have been met or exceeded. The term of protection, the thirty (30) calendar day period specified in subsection (a)(2), and the additional opportunity to cure shall be extended by any period of time during which repair services are not available to the consumer or lessee as a direct result of a war, invasion, fire, flood or other natural disaster. The term of protection, the thirty (30) calendar day period and the additional opportunity to cure shall also be extended by that period of time during which repair services are not available as a direct result of a strike. During a strike, however, the manufacturer, its agent, or its authorized dealer or lessor shall make provision for the free use of a vehicle of comparable year and size by any consumer or lessee whose vehicle is out of service by reason of repair during a strike. The burden shall be on the manufacturer to show that any event claimed as a reason for an extension under the provisions of this section was the direct cause for the failure of the manufacturer, its agent or lessor, or its authorized dealer to cure any nonconformity during the time of that event. Extensions for concurrent events shall not be cumulative. Return to Top Rhode Island Used Car Lemon Law. Gen.Laws 1956, 31-5.2-6. Rights and Remedies Cumulative Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to limit the rights or remedies which are otherwise available to a consumer or lessee under law. Return to Top Rhode Island Lemon Law Statutes. Gen.Laws 1956, 31-5.2-7. Informal Dispute Settlement Procedures If a manufacturer has established an informal dispute settlement procedure which complies in all respects with the provisions of 16 CFR Part 703, or which has been approved by the federal trade commission or by the attorney general of this state, the provisions of § 31-5.2-3 concerning refunds or replacement shall not apply to any consumer or lessee who has not first resorted to that manufacturer’s procedure or to the procedure set forth in § 31-5.2-7.1. This section shall not apply unless the manufacturer, its agents, or its authorized dealer or lessor shall have provided the consumer or lessee with clear and conspicuous written notice of the procedure at the time of delivery of the motor vehicle. A decision resulting from an informal dispute settlement procedure shall be binding upon the manufacturer if the consumer or lessee elects to accept the decision. The manufacturer shall perform its obligations as set forth in the decision within a reasonable period of time not to exceed thirty (30) calendar days from the rendering of the decision. In no event shall a consumer or lessee who has resorted to an informal dispute settlement procedure be precluded from seeking the rights and/or remedies provided by this chapter. Any applicable statute of limitation including, but not limited to, that set forth in § 31-5.2-12 shall be tolled during the period from the initiation of a dispute settlement procedure until thirty (30) days following the rendering of a final decision in the process. Return to Top Rhode Island Lemon Law Rights. Gen.Laws 1956, 31-5.2-7.1. Procedure In addition to any settlement procedure provided for in § 31-5.2-7, the department of the attorney general shall provide an independent arbitration procedure for the settlement of disputes between consumers or lessees and manufacturers concerning motor vehicles which do not conform to all applicable express or implied warranties. There shall be established the motor vehicle arbitration board which shall consist of five (5) members. The board shall consist of the attorney general or his or her designee, who shall serve as director, a member of the general public appointed by the attorney general, the director of the department of revenue or his or her designee, the president of the Rhode Island Automobile Dealers’ Association or his or her designee, and the administrator of the division of motor vehicles or his or her designee, only one of whom shall be directly involved in the manufacture, distribution, sale, lease, or service of any automobile product. Members shall be persons interested in consumer disputes, and shall serve without compensation. An owner or lessee of any motor vehicle purchased or leased which fails to conform to the applicable express or implied warranties may either initiate a request with the department of attorney general for arbitration by the motor vehicle arbitration board or take part in the settlement procedure set forth in § 31-5.2-7 if in existence. The consumer or lessee shall set forth, on a complaint form prescribed by the department of attorney general, any information he or she deems relevant to the resolution of the dispute and shall file the complaint with a nonrefundable filing fee of twenty dollars ($20.00). The attorney general shall decide if the complaint is eligible under chapter 5.2 of this title. Upon acceptance of the complaint, the attorney general shall notify the manufacturer of the filing of a request for arbitration and shall obtain from the manufacturer, in writing on a form prescribed by the attorney general, any information the manufacturer deems relevant to the resolution of the dispute. The manufacturer shall return the form, along with a non-refundable fifty dollar ($50.00) filing fee, within twenty (20) days of receipt. The department of attorney general shall then refer the matter to the motor vehicle arbitration board created pursuant to subsection (a) of this section. The motor vehicle arbitration board shall investigate, gather, and organize all information necessary for a fair and timely decision in each dispute. The board may issue subpoenas to compel the attendance of witnesses and the production of documents, papers, and records relevant to the dispute. At all arbitration proceedings before the board the parties may present oral or written testimony, present witnesses and evidence relevant to the dispute, cross examine witnesses, and be represented by counsel. The motor vehicle arbitration board may forward a copy of all written testimony, including all documentary evidence, to an independent technical expert, who shall review the material and be able to advise and consult with the board. An expert shall sit as a non-voting member of the board whenever oral testimony is presented. The expert shall provide advice and counsel to the board as a part of its deliberation process and shall aid the board in preparing its findings and facts. The motor vehicle arbitration board shall grant the relief specified in § 31-5.2-3 of this chapter and any other relief available under the applicable warranties or the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Federal Trade Commission Improvement Act, 88 Stat. 2183 (1975), 15 U.S.C. § 2301 et seq., as in effect on October 1, 1982, to the consumer or lessee if a reasonable number of attempts, as provided in § 31-5.2-5(1) and (2) have been undertaken to correct one or more nonconformities that substantially impair the motor vehicle. The motor vehicle arbitration board shall dismiss the dispute if it finds, after considering all the evidence presented, that the consumer or lessee is not entitled to relief under this chapter. The board shall, as expeditiously as possible, but not later than ninety (90) days from the date the director deems the dispute eligible for arbitration, render a fair decision based on the information gathered and disclose its findings and the reasons for it to the parties involved. The consumer or lessee shall accept or reject the decision within five (5) days of its filing. If the decision is favorable to the consumer or lessee, the manufacturer shall within thirty (30) days after the rendering of the decision, either comply with the terms of the decision if the consumer or lessee elects to accept the decision or appeal the finding to superior court. No appeal by a manufacturer shall be heard unless the petition for such appeal is filed with the clerk of the superior court within thirty (30) days of issuance of the finding of the motor vehicle arbitration board and is accompanied by a bond in a principal sum equal to the money award made by the state-certified arbitrator plus two thousand five-hundred dollars ($2,500) for anticipated attorneys’ fees, secured by cash or its equivalent, payable to the consumer. The liability of the surety of any bond filed pursuant to this section shall be limited to the indemnification of the consumer in the action. Such bond shall not limit or impair any right of recovery otherwise available pursuant to law, nor shall the amount of the bond be relevant in determining the amount of recovery to which the consumer shall be entitled. In the event that any motor vehicle arbitration board decision, resulting in an award of a refund or replacement, is upheld by the court, recovery by the consumer shall include continuing damages in the amount of twenty-five dollars ($25.00) per day for each day, subsequent to the day the motor vehicle was returned to the manufacturer pursuant to § 31-5.2-3, that said vehicle was out of use as a direct result of any nonconformity not issuing from owner negligence, accident, vandalism or any attempt to repair or substantially modify the vehicle by a person other than the manufacturer, its agent or authorized dealer; provided, however, that the manufacturer did not make a comparable vehicle available to the consumer free of charge. In addition to any other recovery, any prevailing consumer shall be awarded reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs. If the court finds that the manufacturer did not have any reasonable basis for its appeal or that the appeal was frivolous, the court shall double the amount of the total award made to the consumer. The motor vehicle arbitration board shall contact the consumer or lessee, within ten (10) working days after the date for performance, to determine whether performance has occurred. The motor vehicle arbitration board shall maintain the records of each dispute as deemed necessary, including an index of disputes by brand name and model. The motor vehicle arbitration board shall, at intervals of no more than six (6) months, compile and maintain statistics indicating the record of manufacturer compliance with arbitration decisions and the number of refunds or replacement awarded. The summary shall be a public record. The motor vehicle arbitration board automobile dispute settlement procedure shall be prominently posted in the place of business of each new car dealer or lessor licensed by the department of revenue to engage in the sale or lease of that manufacturer’s new motor vehicles. The display of this public notice shall be a condition of licensure under the general laws. The board shall determine the size, type face, form and wording of the sign required by this section, which shall include the telephone number and the address to which requests for the motor vehicle arbitration board arbitration services may be sent. The motor vehicle arbitration board shall adopt regulations, in accordance with the provisions of the general laws to carry out the purposes of this section. Written copies of the regulations and appropriate arbitration hearing procedures shall be provided to any person upon request. Return to Top Rhode Island new Car Lemon Law. Gen.Laws 1956, 31-5.2-8. Waiver of Rights Prohibited Any agreement entered into by a consumer or lessee for the purchase or lease of a new motor vehicle which waives, limits, or disclaims the rights set forth in this chapter shall be void as contrary to public policy. These rights shall inure to a subsequent transferee of the motor vehicle. Return to Top Rhode Island Automobile Lemon Law. Gen.Laws 1956, 31-5.2-9. Disclosure of Nonconformity Prior to Resale No motor vehicle that is returned to the manufacturer under the provisions of this chapter shall be resold or re-leased in the state without clear and conspicuous written disclosure to the prospective purchaser or lessee prior to resale of the fact that it was so returned due to a nonconformity. The attorney general shall prescribe the exact form and content of the disclosure statement. Return to Top Rhode Island Vehicle Lemon Law. Gen.Laws 1956, 31-5.2-10. Cause of Action An aggrieved consumer or lessee may bring an action under the Rules of Civil Procedure in the superior court to enforce the provisions of this chapter. Return to Top Rhode Island Vehicle Lemon Law. Gen.Laws 1956, 31-5.2-11. Attorney’s Fees The court hearing a complaint brought by a consumer or lessee aggrieved by a violation of this chapter shall award reasonable attorney’s fees to a prevailing plaintiff. Return to Top Rhode Island Used Car Lemon Law. Gen.Laws 1956, 31-5.2-12. Commencement of Action Any action brought pursuant to this chapter shall be commenced within three (3) years of the date of original delivery of the motor vehicle to the consumer or lessee or within two (2) years of the date on which the mileage on the motor vehicle reached fifteen thousand (15,000) miles, whichever is earlier. Return to Top Rhode Island Lemon Law Statutes. Gen.Laws 1956, 31-5.2-13. Deceptive Trade Practice A manufacturer’s failure to comply with any of the provisions of this chapter shall constitute a deceptive trade practice under the terms of chapter 13.1 of title 6. All of the public and private remedies provided for in chapter 13.1 of title 6 shall be available to enforce the provisions of this chapter. Return to Top Rhode Island Lemon Law Rights. Gen.Laws 1956, 31-5.2-14. Consumers’ Council Automobile Dispute Settlement Panel–Motor Vehicle Arbitration Board Whenever the term “consumer’s council automobile dispute settlement panel,” for the purpose of providing an independent arbitration procedure for the settlement of disputes between consumers or lessees and manufactures concerning motor vehicles which do not conform to all applicable express or implied warranties is used, the term shall mean the motor vehicle arbitration board established by the department of attorney general pursuant to § 31-5.2-7.1. Return to Top Consumer Protection Attorneys To connect with these law firms for a FREE CASE REVIEW or more information: Call: Toll Free (888) 565-3666 Email: Help@CarLemon.com In Rhode Island and through this site, Daniel N. Ruggiero, Attorney at Law provides Lemon Law representation with Weisberg Consumer Law Group PA and litigates claims under state and federal consumer financial protection laws dealing with vehicles with Thompson Consumer Law Group. Click here for more information about these law firms and how they may be able to help Rhode Island Lemon Law

November 09, 2022

Dealership Rating
Employee Rating

Never have I been so listened to and validated. Matt went over and beyond to make sure my car was in safe running order. He made sure I had a rental while it was in the shop. When new issues popped More

by cynthia
Service Price Transparency
Workmanship
Service Time
Service Communication
Recommend Dealer
Yes
Nov 09, 2022

Tasca Automotive Group responded

Thank you for sharing your excellent experience with Tasca Automotive Group. We're thrilled to hear that Matt was outstanding. Thank you for this fantastic five-star review. We appreciate your business, Cynthia. We look forward to having you as one of our valued customers for years to come.

October 25, 2022

Dealership Rating
Employee Rating

When I finally was contacted by Amber Morris, my eventual sales person, I was hopeful we would find the car I wanted. No luck until then. She listened and searched. A week later, she called and said "There More

by bk2
Customer Service
Recommend Dealer
Yes

Other Employees Tagged: Amber Morris

Oct 26, 2022

Tasca Automotive Group responded

Thank you for sharing your experience with us! We're happy to hear it went well with Amber and we hope you enjoy your new vehicle. We truly appreciate your feedback!

March 09, 2021

Dealership Rating
Employee Rating

Three years ago, I leased a Mazda from Tasca. That was my first Tasca experience. That was also when I first met my salesperson, Bayo Dina. He made the process easy and seamless and I was immediately impress More

by toddayotte
Customer Service
Quality Of Work
Friendliness
Price
Recommend Dealer
Yes

Other Employees Tagged: Bayo Dina

December 29, 2020

Dealership Rating
Employee Rating

The Tasca group was a pleasure to work with, Cannon specifically was attentive and easy to work with. My requests and needs were taken care of in a timely manor. More

by Glenn C
Customer Service
Quality Of Work
Friendliness
Price
Recommend Dealer
Yes

Other Employees Tagged: Cannon Brian

Dec 29, 2020

Tasca Automotive Group responded

Glenn, It's great to hear that Cannon was able to get you exactly what you needed. Our goal is to make sure everyone who walks through the door leaves happy. Thanks again for choosing Tasca Automotive Group! Sincerely, The Tasca Family

November 06, 2020

Dealership Rating
Employee Rating

BEST CAR BUYING EXPERIENCE EVER!!!JOSEPHINE, DOUG AND BEST CAR BUYING EXPERIENCE EVER!!! JOSEPHINE, DOUG AND ANDREW DID A PHENOMAL JOB ASSISTING ME WITH MY PURCHASE!!! I WOULD RECCOMEND THEM TO ANY More

by JOES1972
Customer Service
Quality Of Work
Friendliness
Price
Recommend Dealer
Yes
Nov 06, 2020

Tasca Automotive Group responded

Thank you so much for your wonderful review! We are thrilled that we had the opportunity to provide you with the perfect vehicle and deal. We are so excited for you to enjoy your new car, and we thank you for choosing Tasca Automotive Group! Sincerely, the Tasca Family

1